Search for: "Williams v. Michigan Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Friedman
Michigan Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:12 am by Jason Shinn
Take for example a recent Michigan employment decision arising under the Michigan’s Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (Michigan’s Disabilities Civil Rights Act) (Williams v Michigan Department of Corrections 7/21/2015). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
FABIAN On August 7, 2008, the district court committed Peterson to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Corrections for one year and one day for his conviction of failing to register as a predatory offender. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
This case involves the Michigan Department of Corrections' (MDOC) release of several corrections officers' social security numbers and birth dates to prisoners held at the Ionia Maximum Security Correctional Facility (IMAX), which houses male prisoners 07a0292p.06 2007/08/02 O'Neill v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
Petitioners, inmates in Michigan prisons, filed grievances using the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) grievance process. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-736 Issues: (1) Whether the Multistate Tax Compact has the status of a contract that binds its signatory states; and (2) whether a state law that imposes retroactive tax liability for a period of almost seven yea [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Williams    Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0435n.06 Sulaj v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Rutter, No. 06-1473 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against several employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections challenging plaintiff's placement and continued confinement in administrative segregation, dismissal pursuant to section 1997e(c) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court erred in dismissing a due process claim on the ground that the duration of plaintiff's prison discipline,… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am by Frank Ravitch
Stowers Chair in Law & Religion Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]